Census figures, Canvey Green Belt, the Environment Agency, Castle Point Council and the consequences of saying and doing Nothing!

This article may lose the Canvey Green Belt Campaign Group a few of our Mainland Campaign Group friends. If it does I apologise, but the justification is in the title of our Group name.

Canvey Island residents have long been castigated for claiming that Council decision-making has borne a bias resulting in housing and industrial development being “dumped on Canvey.”

Only last week at the Council meeting to adopt the Local Plan’s 5 year housing allocation cllr N.Smith attempted to deny this claim as he explained the housing allocation was balanced as “449 proposed for Canvey and 529 dwellings”* for the mainland. *( 200 per annum requirement x 5 years actually should be 1000, a shortfall of 22 dwellings), (No mention also, of the extra 20% buffer that will be required).

Tuesday the 11th December saw the release of the 2011 Census statistics.     Castle Point has seen little increase in population, a 1.6% increase since 2001, from 86,608 to 88,011.

What has this to do with the “dumped on Canvey” phrase?

Well, examining the figures more closely the Canvey Island population in 2001 was 37,479 and has increased to 38,459 by 2011.

Therefore the Mainland figures are 49,129 in 2001 and 49,552 for 2011.

Shown as percentage increases, Canvey Island 2.6% and the Mainland just 0.8% increase!

Yet again Canvey has shouldered the responsibility of the Borough’s population growth along with the problems that this poses to our infrastructure!

This increase during a decade, that the Council encouraged the impression that there existed a moratorium on building in the Flood Risk area of Canvey Island. This we denied and had accepted by the Planning Inspector at the Core Strategy Examination, technically the only major hurdle to overcome was the production of a comprehensive site flood risk assessments.

During the new Local Plan process we have seen a group of housing proposals for Canvey Island progressed.                                                                                                    In total these again will result in the majority of new builds allocated to Canvey Island.

To build in a Flood Risk Zone 3, the Sequential Test must first be passed. Council Officers are given the power to apply this Test. The Test seeks to locate housing in zones of lesser flood risk. The Officers choose to consider Canvey Island as a separate entity, rather than sharing housing need across the Borough.

Whatever the proposal size, whether for 4 flats, 99 dwellings at the Point or 600 plus dwellings at Thorney Bay, the Officers justify the passing of the Sequential Test by stating “When applying a Sequential Test in Castle Point it is important to have regard to the local context. Canvey Island is a distinctive community, accommodating 43% of the Borough’s population. It has specific identified needs in terms of social, economic and physical regeneration, as well as housing.”                                                                                                                                            I emphasise “needs in terms of housing.”

Have the Mainland no “specific identified needs in terms of housing” of their own?

Judging by previous decades it appears not.

If the answer is no, fair enough. But don’t let Mainland Councillors claim that they have not used Canvey to absorb the growth in previous decades for their own political survival.

Between 1971 and 2001 Canvey Island saw an increase in population of over 40%. The Mainland saw just a 2.4% increase during the same period.

Now the latest Census figures show the balance of growth across the Borough as relying on Canvey absorbing the majority of it.

Our Green Belt has suffered. However this argument is not a reason for the Mainland Green Belt to be released.

Officers are encouraged to apply the Sequential Test so as to secure the release of Canvey land for the benefit of protecting the mainland from development. The Environment Agency, by their inaction, can only be considered compliant by their continued confidence in the Local Planning Authority’s ability to fairly apply the Test and our Development Committee’s decision making ability.

Unlike Mainland Councillors, Canvey Green Belt Campaign Group will again welcome the Planning Inspector examining the new Local Plan!


4 responses to “Census figures, Canvey Green Belt, the Environment Agency, Castle Point Council and the consequences of saying and doing Nothing!

  1. Some great points made here!

  2. Ask any commuter taking 45 minutes to get on and off Canvey at the moment and I think you will get the same answer. Whether green belt, brown field site or development of old sites, enough is enough, doctors, schools and roads cannot take any more houses. We are and always have been the dumping ground. Born on Canvey in 1971 the changes have been massive, and still we are not worthy of a full time fire station or police station, just mass buildings.
    I truly hope these results put an end to it.

  3. I am currently watching our local plan being scrutinised by a QC who is held in high esteem by property developers.
    If the PI agrees with FLP’s legal arguements, methods and test cases, we are all going to be dumped on, and believe me in far far greater numbers than 200 + 20% per year.
    At the moment it is totalling around 500 per year.

  4. The over populating of Canvey has been systematically planned knowing that its evacuation in an emergency would be a legistical nightmare. Responsibility will have to be taken for the ramifications.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s