Glebelands Appeal result to define dangers to Castle Point Green Belt

Whilst we are waiting for the Planning Inspector and the Secretary of States ruling on’ the Glebelands development it is worth remembering that the existance of Green Belt within Castle Point was questioned by the developers Fox Land.
At the Examination a representative of FLP claimed that CPBC’s failure to save the 1998 Green Belt policy meant that the Green Belt boundaries were not accurately defined. In response Castle Point Council claimed that the 1998 Proposals Map was sufficient to serve the purpose.
It is worth noting that similar issues, although not the same, are being played out within the York Local Plan.
Last April the Local Plan process at York was suspended, note the apparent urgency in proceedings and the fact that the CPBC new Local Plan process is being played out at a slower rate, this in itself may prove problematical with not only Glebelands but also Jotmans Farm proposal. Let’s hope this doubt is unfounded.
Back in April 2012 it was reported:
From reports the Inspector (David Vickery) gave a clear indication that he was prepared to suspend the Exam until October if the Council agreed that such action was appropriate. The Council stated clearly that it would respond positively to such a suspension. A letter will go out from the inspector next week.
Key problems was the inability to show duty to cooperate solutions to meeting the housing requirements of the City and the fact that the inner edge of the York Green Belt has failed to be defined in a development plan which has allowed large tracts of ‘draft’ Green Belt to be developed.
The only statutory Policy relating to a Green Belt encircling the City is contained in the RSS (Yorkshire & Humberside), which is likely to be abolished during the summer. When that happens, York will have not even have a draft Green Belt, so the CS will therefore have to justify a Green Belt as well as defining its boundaries. A key policy test in the NPPF from PPS2 is that new Green Belt boundaries should be defined to be defensible in perpetuity, including where necessary setting out areas of strategic reserve.
Expect housebuilders to slap in applications now. If they were put in now they would fail the prematurity test, but if York is slow (longer than 6-8 months) to come up with realistic proposals to meet housing need and a realistic inner boundary then expect the appeals to go to inquiry and give the SoS a difficult case as his own policy would then indicate approval. After all there would be no Green Belt if the SoS chooses to abolish the RSS. The SoS can of course choose to selectively revoke the RSS leaving the Green Belt intact but its inner boundary undefined. Expect JRs whatever happens.
York is really up against the clock. It needs to put forward and SEA and consult on urban extension options and get it back to Full Council within this period – a very hard task.
There is an action that York can undertake that is tractable within a short period of time – but that advice is on the clock.
York News reported last Saturday that alterations had been made to the Draft Local Plan.
PLANS to build almost 22,000 new homes in York over the next 15 years have been unveiled by city leaders. City of York Council has today confirmed its preferred options for its draft Local Plan, which maps out how the city will be developed between 2015 and 2030. Only with a proper Local Plan will areas which have been considered to be Green Belt actually be defined and protected. The Local Plan protects the beautiful views of the city at points of entry and from the Outer Ring Road, and it will protect York’s sense of place and our heritage.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s