Cabinet to note Green Belt issues, homelessness and lack of maintenance where flood prevention issues are concerned!

The Canvey Green Belt Campaign Group note that within the September Castle Point Cabinet Agenda is comment as to progress of the new Local Plan. Much is made of the implications of the Glebelands Judicial Review findings creating delays in Local Plan progress.
There are several warning indicators for those residents concerned of the future of our Green Belts.
It appears that the Council intend to re-draw Green Belt boundaries as these appear tightly drawn around the urban areas so as to provide the housing numbers required.
The promise of the protection offered by the Localism Bill, as explained by Caroline Spelman on her visit to meet local Green Belt Groups prior to the Parliamentary Elections, appear to be of little consequence.
The opportunity to set local targets to meet local need amount to a requirement to match the extinct RSS figures.

The Cabinet Agenda makes a point that wealth difference between mainland and Island residents has widened.

“ Homelessness Strategy Plan Draft P.18
Development of New Local Plan
The Council is currently preparing a New Local Plan, which will aim to meet the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework to boost significantly the supply of housing.
However it is likely that environmental constraints and Green
Belt designation will prevent the full need for housing being met. This has implications for the affordability of housing in the borough.
Initial findings from the Strategic Housing Market Assessment Review 2012 indicate that the demand for affordable housing in Castle Point is high (at least 57%). This percentage need
for affordable housing is expected to increase if lower levels of total housing provision are achieved.
Affordability issues arising from the supply of housing
within the borough may therefore act to drive up cases of homelessness amongst local families who are unable to access or maintain payments for homes in Castle Point.”

A special point is made in the Agenda on the caravan dwellings at Thorney Bay.
On one hand these dwellings are used to count as previously completed dwellings (Glebelands defence), whilst on the other hand mention is made to the proposed re-development and the risk this re-development would pose to the Housing Options Service from the expected large influx of homeless enquiries from the current residents. The Council admit / recognise careful and proactive planning for this risk is necessary.
It seems strange that this point should only now become worthy of being publically recognised by CPBC!

There appears a determination to build a case for there being an inflated local need for housing on Canvey island, above and beyond that on the mainland.
Clearly the mainland areas have provided a tiny percentage of the Borough’s housing over the previous 40 years yet this appears to only warrant effort being made in maintaining the situation. The Deanes School issues and the need for regeneration on the mainland that is so clearly apparent and yet denied due to political impacts

We are either all in this together or a divided Borough.
If we are divided then let there be an indication of the local needs of local Canvey people, rather than the transient population that distort the picture.

It does not need repeating that Canvey Island is a Flood Risk Zone 3 area.
The Sequential Test is quite clear on what areas should and should not be developed.
There is pressure applied on Officers to get around this obstacle.

The urbanisation on Canvey is denser than many other areas in the Borough, the 60 Acres estate is an example of a development without adequate green recreational areas.
The recent flooding from the heavy rainfall highlighted problems in over-urbanization.
Should that flooding have been from the sea defences failing, the true value of the Green Belt on Canvey Island and it’s value as a flood plain would be learned.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Cabinet to note Green Belt issues, homelessness and lack of maintenance where flood prevention issues are concerned!

  1. A very interesting article and accurate, all the problems you mention are a true reflection of the current position there is nothing new just some of the same the leading Conservative groups target is still Canvey Island but all the evidence points to a failed New Local Plan the issue that now comes to light and the main driver is money we are clearly in trouble, previously this was not a problem but austerity as caught us up, i thought to be fair to him that the Deputy leader Councillor Stanley told the truth we are heading for a disaster but he has to understand the Conservatives are just a bunch of “nimbys building is ok but not in my back yard”.

    Canvey as fully complied with the clear findings of the inspector after the last examination Canvey must have some development to meet there needs any Canvey Resident can see new development two new schools, a new college and new homes the “Mainland the big nothing and the loss of Deans school what a disaster” simply they have took there eye of the ball game.

    But i see no new evidence to suggest only peppercorn silly builds going in on the Mainland a small group of conservative Councillors working behind the doors of the Councils bunker room with nothing to offer but the pending disaster of failure, no new evidence and nothing to offer,easy to predict this is a group making only one plan an exit plan as UKIP close in for the final kill.like the Labour party did leaving total carnage with no money left in the bank.leaving just a few younger Conservative Councillors to try to re-build a party that’s had its day most of the other Conservatives Councillors well over retirement age and well out of ideas.thanks again for a good article.
    Neville.

  2. That’s a tad too political for me Neville, but thanks for the continued interest. You are correct the problems facing the Council will not be solved by the same old solutions. If a Local Plan is to be achieved, and the Mainland Group have never understated the importance of this being required to “save” Glebelands, a radical approach will be required. Whether the incumbent Authority are capable of achieving this prior to the next bout of Council elections we can only wait and see.
    The offer of assistance by the Core Strategy Inspector was rejected I assumed because Officers, at the time, felt capable of creating an acceptable strategy. After nearly 3 years it is apparent that we are no nearer producing a Local Plan and are faced with an even bigger challenge despite the emergence of Localism. Editor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s