Neighbourhood Plan over-rides Planning Inspector Inquiry decision, despite lack of 5 year Housing Supply

It appears the issue of Neighbourhood Plans has spiked some interest in Canvey Island residents. The Canvey Green Belt Campaign motion was unanimously rejected by our Town Council, however a Blog reader has sent in this piece of information;

“Neighbourhood plans help block three different housing development appeals

Published: Thursday, 22nd September 2016

Communities Secretary highlights Neighbourhood Plans as a key factor in each of his decisions to dismiss schemes in East and West Sussex and near Bath…

Communities Secretary Sajid Javid has disagreed with his inspector and dismissed a recovered appeal for 100 dwellings, 30 per cent of which would be affordable, at Yapton in West Sussex.

This was despite the council being unable to demonstrate a five-year supply of land for housing and agreeing that the policies in the Yapton Neighbourhood Plan (NP) restricting development outside of settlement boundaries were out of date.

However, the SoS placed substantial weight on the conflict with the “social element of sustainability” in the made NP.

Meanwhile the SoS has also dismissed two other appeals involving sites in areas covered by neighbourhood plans. In both cases the refusals were in line with the recommendations of the inspectors who held the recovered inquiries.

The first involved an outline proposal for a 32-dwelling scheme on land at Bishop Sutton that was refused by Bath & North East Somerset Council.

Javid wasn’t satisfied that the council could convincingly demonstrate a five-year housing land supply across the district as a whole and acknowledged that policies on housing supply were out of date.

He agreed there were significant housing benefits to the scheme and that the village has sufficient capacity in terms of facilities and services to accommodate the new housing. However, he concluded that the scheme fell down on the objective of providing a reasonable match between jobs and dwellings to help reduce travel distances to work. This called into question the scheme’s overall sustainability.

The third development involved outline plans for a development of 70 dwellings (including affordable housing), a sports and community building, tennis courts, synthetic turf playing pitch amenity and open space at Ringmer in East Sussex refused by Lewes District Council.

The SoS noted the benefits of the scheme but considered there would be harm to the environmental role in relation to heritage assets and landscape as well as harm to the social role in terms of the conflict with the neighbourhood plan.

IF ONLY….”

So whilst we are told that Neighbourhood Plans cannot veer away from a Local Plan, the Communities secretary is not working outside of reasoned arguments.

This Campaign group continue to feel that we are aware of enough issues within the CPBC Local Plan 2016 for a Canvey Island Neighbourhood Plan, to work alongside and to have a positive impression on the Borough Plan.

This would take an unlikely U-Turn by the current Town Council.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Neighbourhood Plan over-rides Planning Inspector Inquiry decision, despite lack of 5 year Housing Supply

  1. The Localism Act 2011 gave communities direct power to shape the development and growth of their local area through a neighbourhood plan or to grant planning permission through Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build Orders. As of summer 2016, around 2,000 communities across England have taken up their new neighbourhood planning powers. There have been over 200 neighbourhood planning referendums, all of which have been successful, with an average yes vote of 89%. We would like to see many more communities make use of their neighbourhood planning powers.

    Through neighbourhood planning and active participation at an early stage in other plan-making processes, communities have both a voice in decisions and a choice about development in their area. They are likely to then become the proponents – rather than the opponents – of appropriate growth.

  2. The biggest problem is complacency coursed by a complete lack of trust in main stream politics. there has to be a lot more publicity on what people can do if they put there minds to it. a good example is on this very face book. People do respond if its set out in a way they can understand it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s